Saturday, October 9, 2010

The Book of Stats

There is an earnest Whiffler named Stats.  The game was good to him, restoring his sanity each Sabbath.  He was good to the game, bringing statistical order to the subjective chaos of the early years.  He loved teams that are bad, historically bad even, and despised the great teams for their arrogance.  Ever concerned that his fellow whifflers may have “cursed the Whiffle Gods in their hearts” he habitually carried a clip board and sharpened pencils as a pardon for their sins.

The Whiffle Gods gathered the Commissioner and the other “Sons of Kothar” (literal translation: the “adversaries,” or the “visitors”) and asked them what they thought of Stats.  “His faith in the game is constructed upon numbers,” one said, “as his numbers go down, so will his love of the game.”  “He understands not the true spirit of Whiffle,” said another.  “He is susceptible to the tailing outside curveball,” said a third.  The Whiffle Gods heard these words and allowed the Sons of Kothar to test Stats.

As the first batter to face Stats, the one called “Bush” struck a double and the test was on.  It would be short-lived, though as the one called “Cebulash” (literal translation: “Onion”) grounded weakly into a double play.  The Commissioner followed with a strikeout.  The next time Stats pitched would also begin with a hit, but then followed a string of three outs.  The Sons of Kothar thereupon asked the Gods if they may test Stats while he held the bat, rather than the ball.  This wish was granted.

With the home team, the Team of Stats, holding a slim 2-1 lead through the middle innings, the torture began:
Stats came to the plate in the 3rd - bases loaded, two out and was struck out by the Commissioner.
Two on two out in the fourth - flew out by the one called Cebulash.
Two on, two out in the fifth and in desperation stats wrent his clothes and batted lefty - only to ground out to the one called Bush.
Runner at second two out in the seventh - struck out by the Commissioner.  
Two on, two out in the eighth - struck out by the one called Cebulash
In all, he strandeth 10 runners.

The Sons of Kothar were most pleased with themselves, and they shamelessly called for another inning so that they might face Tim Baker, who made his long awaited return to the pitch, and whom they were pridefully sure they could hit.  The one called Bush did double in a run, and then another scored on a disputed double play attempt off the bat of the one called Cebulash.  Disputed or no, the Sons of Kothar, the visitors, led 3-2 entering the last of the ninth.

The Whiffle Gods saw that the Visitors took too much boastful joy in their ill-gotten lead, and the tortures of Stats, and sent a whirlwind to cloud their minds and eyes.  For in the bottom of the ninth, the visitors sent the one called “Ben” to the mound to pitch.  Ben had also pitched the second inning when the Team of Stats, the home team, scored two on a bases loaded double by the one called “Zamonski” (literal translation: “doubles machine”).  Ben also pitched the sixth, escaping a bases loaded jam by getting a one-out fly ball from Stats and a ground out from Baker.  Since Ben had pitched the second and the sixth, it was clearly not his turn to pitch the ninth; it was the turn of the one called Bush who had not allowed a run all day.  The home team, knowing of the mistake by a simple check of the scoresheet, chose not to inform the Sons of Kothar of their error.

Tim Baker’s lead off strike out was followed by singles by the ones called Zamonski, Hansoo and Mosser, bringing Stats to the plate.  A couple of inside pitches were followed by a breaker that found the middle of the strike zone.  The next pitch brought out Stats’ first swing - a foul tip for strike two.  The final pitch was brought to the bat by the Whiffle Gods, and was blooped over the head of the one named Ben, finding asphalt in front of the outfielders which the Gods had positioned too deep.  A 2-RBI double, walk-off style to end the contest - and the tortures.





1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
R
H
LOB
Dave B, Glen, Pete, Ben
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
3
13
9
Hansoo, Kurt, Matt, Tim, Eric
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
4
23
19
W: Tim Baker
L: Ben Montague
BS: Tim Baker, Ben Montague


ABHBIABHBI
Dave B1031Hansoo1080
Glen1031Kurt1060
Peter1031Matt1022
Ben940Tim920
Eric952

Notes:
  • Peter had two home run distance fly balls and a third that would have been a triple caught for outs .  Glen had no homers either and the home run race remains knotted at five.
  • Even though Kurt was not on their team, the Visitors did mange to pitch out of order.  As told in the story above, the Home side was fully aware of the mistake before a pitch had been thrown, but decided to keep silent.
  • Ben’s fine day at the plate was overshadowed by the four runs he allowed in his 2 and a third innings pitched.
  • 8-for-10 batting brought Hansoo above the 0.400 mark, but still well behind Kurt’s league leading 0.461.  Kurt leads in hits (120), tied for the lead in doubles (18) and is third in slugging.
  • There is also a tight race for pitching strikeouts.  Kurt has 125, one ahead of of Peter’s 124.  Matt is well behind, but did record his 100th K today.

19 comments:

  1. Nicely scribed. For the record, I had three caught behind the homer line...man how we need a fence!

    Commish

    ReplyDelete
  2. I wonder. Was it morally wrong of the home team not to inform the visitors that they were pitching out of order, or, was it morally right? I would argue that it's morally right, as was Geters' pretending to be hurt a few weeks back. Timely and effective cheating is part of the moral landscape of sport. Hats off to the home team cheaters!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Gamesmanship. Or is that spelled "Jamesmanship"?

    ReplyDelete
  4. @ Anonymous (Glen): It was a case of ineffective cheating. The cheater is the team that bats/pitches out of order, no? It was the visiting team that "cheated" by sending the wrong guy to the mound. Had they sent a better pitcher than due, we certainly would have pointed out the error. But as they sent Ben we did not feel so obliged.

    Now, if anyone on the visiting team had asked us who was supposed to pitch, the moral thing to do would have been to tell you that Dave B. was due. And of course the Visitors were in possession of the score sheet for the entire top of the ninth, and could have at any time simply read across the top line to determine the pitching order.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Lying by omission does not justify the other team's oversight. As a regular player, Matt, you are obliged to help the other team when they are about to make an honest mistake. Especially knowing how connected you are to the stats, stats. Not to mention your scoresheets are incomplete! Either way, 3 - 2 was a good game but the commissioner's office might have a word with you in the office...

    ReplyDelete
  6. Glen apparently cannot see "personal responsibility" from his house; perhaps Dave (R-OH) can provide some help?

    It wasn't our job to help you; it was our job to beat you. We did our job.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Firstly, Matt, I don't think "cheating" and making a mistake are the same thing. Cheating implies intentionality. We didn't bat out of order on purpose. We may be incompetent losers, but we're not imbeciles. Secondly, I don't see you as being morally obliged to tell the truth in that situation, even if we asked. Your job was to win, which is what I said originally.

    ReplyDelete
  8. You see, I meant to say "we didn't pitch out of order on purpose". Again, incompetent and error prone, but neither a cheater or an imbecile

    ReplyDelete
  9. BTW, I can see "personal responsibility" from my house. It's right next to Russia. I'm not a witch. I'm you.

    ReplyDelete
  10. ok, i may not be batting .400+ (like SOME fancy-boy franchise players who shall remain nameless) so my opinion may be one of weak minority, but i gotta say: this whole mini-controversy rides on the initial assumption that ben's a meat-ball tosser on the mound. i totally disagree. i've noticed that ben's stuff has gotten wayyyy better than it was last year, and in spite of the fact that i did hit off him this week, he uncorked some pretty wicked bafflers in my direction. just sayin.

    ReplyDelete
  11. a kvetch might point out that a) we didn't have to play another inning and b) tim might have had a double play. a kvetch would. instead, we let you do what you wanted, we did what we wanted.


    it is also true, as the doubles machine points out, ben is no ham 'n egger. he does have a magnificent strike zone, as well.

    signed,
    some person glen thinks he's talking to

    ReplyDelete
  12. It is true that Ben's pitching is being maligned here. But it is also true that we immediately felt the visiting team were doing us a favor by not putting Dave B. on the mound. Just sayin'.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I should say: the only 2 hits I got all morning were off Ben, so at the very least, it was favorable to me. My teammates were having fine days no matter who was pitching.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I thought the issue of "cheating" was an interesting topic for a dispassionate discussion. It wasn't a personal issue. Ben's pitching was never being maligned and the debate over that is not germane. Forget it.

    ReplyDelete
  15. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  16. seems to me that in this context everything is germane. or nothing is.

    ReplyDelete
  17. really, it's not worth it. I just thought it was an interesting little element in last week's game. I've been suitably chastened. I'm sorry I brought it up.

    ReplyDelete
  18. am i alone in thinking that while the artist may have been chastened, he may not have been suitably chastened?

    ReplyDelete